Roberto Lazo

The story is contradicted

December 2, 2011

/ / The neuron-neuron adventurous adventurer

Aramburu Melquiades Iñigo was a scholar born in 1755 in Zarautz, although there are doubts about whether he saw the light in Bilbao.

Melquiades is a character in the story, who distinguished himself as a great debater, stickler learned the art of contradict in any gathering or meeting.

He had a great command of demagogy, which soon develop strongly to all those who dared to contradict him in his arguments.

Iñigo Aramburú Melquiades as a merchant traveling throughout Europe reaching enter circles most controversial of the great thinkers of his time.

Never wrote a book, or affiliated with any social or political movement, free spirit and stickler, defended against all its disquisiones.

Among his most famous stories stands, one in which he came to affirm that only read one book in his life, the Bible.

No one can say that Inigo Melquiades Aramburú possessed a doctrine or philosophical system itself, which will fit into any of the different streams or schools of thought of his time. Insistence on everything and everyone, regardless of their social scale or circumstances that might be.

The main consequence of the great stickler was his controversy with the author of the critique of pure reason and practical reason. Emmanuel Kant stickler knowing the reputation of Melquiades, challenged him to hold a discussion letter, in which he urges Melquiades contradict this maxim, that the German thinker attributed to his person and ways of behaving:

"Stickler deniers or only demonstrate their own right when aporia, thus confirming their own ignorance and falsehood"

The letter was traveling up to half of Europe with Basque in London. Melquiades no intimidation before the figure of Kant and accept the challenge without measuring the consequences are caused so much controversy.

In a letter dated February 29, 1772, the distinguished philosopher Melquiades said.

ignorance is rocket science to apply because inspires bright minds to insist of its manifestations, thus taking his words, the ignorant is expressed by the wisdom of the unlearned, being these spirits of contradiction, that give reason for being and existence those who possess a clear mind, but ignorant, first denied and then claim and go on to develop doctrines and maxims, which do not change the people to think simple and off the general feeling. You can live without thinking.

The great thinkers of history and invent using empty words to say about great mysteries, without, except tricks of rhetoric and dialectic convoluted attempt to define, which no one cares, except the egotistical vanity and glory chasers. First great thinkers who were wise and ignorant stickler.

As might know Melquiades failed to convince the critical Kant, yet in his last letter, he wrote:

Melquiades Iñigo logic Aramburu, not being successful, is not without reason in the world of ignorance and uncouth stickler.

Of Melquiades not been heard, it was losing its track in Italy where some said they got a Carthusian monk professed a vow of silence.

The history of bizarre sometimes makes a moral characters with their lives turning them into a universal principle.

Before Iñigo recalls Melquiades porfiar Aramburú.

This work, unless otherwise expressly states, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License .